Comments on: Freiheitsstatue abreißen? http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/ Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:32:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: Atlantic Review http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-589 Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:27:19 +0000 http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-589 <strong>The Guantanamo detainee from Germany</strong> One of the more than 500 detainees at Guantanamo is the 23 years old Murat Kurnaz, who was born and raised in Bremen in northern Germany. He travelled to Pakistan in October 2001, was arrested shortly afterwards and detained at Guantanamo Bay since at lea The Guantanamo detainee from Germany

One of the more than 500 detainees at Guantanamo is the 23 years old Murat Kurnaz, who was born and raised in Bremen in northern Germany. He travelled to Pakistan in October 2001, was arrested shortly afterwards and detained at Guantanamo Bay since at lea

]]> by: Wolf http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-276 Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:21:48 +0100 http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-276 Es gibt aber auch ein paar gute positive Entwicklungen: <a href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/143-guide.html">http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/143-guide.html</a> Es gibt aber auch ein paar gute positive Entwicklungen:
http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/143-guide.html

]]> by: Boche http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-248 Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:32:16 +0100 http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-248 Ok, dann war meine (eher intuitive) Übersetzung also in etwa richtig. Trauriger- und skandalöserweise. Ok, dann war meine (eher intuitive) Übersetzung also in etwa richtig.

Trauriger- und skandalöserweise.

]]> by: Wolf http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-246 Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:22:35 +0100 http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-246 Ja, so schreibt das der Boston Globe. John Roberts ist bereits vom Senat bestätigter Vorsitzender des Obersten Gerichtshofs. Ja, so schreibt das der Boston Globe.

John Roberts ist bereits vom Senat bestätigter Vorsitzender des Obersten Gerichtshofs.

]]> by: antibuerokratieteam.de http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-241 Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:16:21 +0100 http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-241 <strong>Ein grosser Sieg des Terrorismus</strong> Die M&#246;glichkeit ohne Anklageerhebung auf Anordnung der Ermittlungsbeh&#246;rden unbegrenzt inhaftiert zu werden, anstatt des Rechts auf ein ordentliches Gerichtsverfahren, in dem sich der Inhaftierte unter Hinzuziehung eines Rechtsanwaltes verte... Ein grosser Sieg des Terrorismus

Die Möglichkeit ohne Anklageerhebung auf Anordnung der Ermittlungsbehörden unbegrenzt inhaftiert zu werden, anstatt des Rechts auf ein ordentliches Gerichtsverfahren, in dem sich der Inhaftierte unter Hinzuziehung eines Rechtsanwaltes verte…

]]> by: Boche http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-240 Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:07:24 +0100 http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-240 Wenn ich das mit meinen mageren Englisch-Kenntnissen richtig übersetzt habe, sind speziell Roberts und Miers, die beiden Bush-Kandidaten für den Obersten Gerichtshof, Unterstützer des Regierungskurses, die Grundrechte auszuhöhlen? Wenn ich das mit meinen mageren Englisch-Kenntnissen richtig übersetzt habe, sind speziell Roberts und Miers, die beiden Bush-Kandidaten für den Obersten Gerichtshof, Unterstützer des Regierungskurses, die Grundrechte auszuhöhlen?

]]> by: Wolf http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-239 Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:03:00 +0100 http://streiflicht.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/freiheitsstatue-abreissen/#comment-239 In diesem Zusammenhang ist vielleicht interessant, was der Boston Globe ueber den neuen Verfassungsrichter Roberts und die Nominierung von Miers schreibt: Miers has also been outspoken in her support of reauthorizing the Patriot Act, which gave the executive branch new powers of surveillance over US citizens. (...) A New York University law professor, David Golove, said executive power is emerging as a defining issue for the Supreme Court in the post-Sept. 11, 2001, era. In case after case, the Bush administration has argued that it has the authority to take measures it deems necessary to stop terrorists, while others have insisted on maintaining checks and balances. ''Executive power issues are going to be coming before the court that are of tremendous significance," Golove said, pointing to challenges to Patriot Act surveillance powers, the treatment of Guantanamo Bay prisoners, and the case of Jose Padilla, a US citizen being held without trial under the authority asserted by Bush to imprison anyone whom the government suspects of being a terrorist. As the lineup of the Supreme Court evolves, so may its rulings on how much power the Constitution gives the president. That prospect has sent analysts hunting for clues in the records of Bush's nominees. This summer, for example, when Roberts was still an appeals court judge, he was part of a three-judge panel that ruled that Bush could bypass the Geneva Conventions, which require that prisoners of war be given court-martials, and could instead try a detainee before a military commission. Their holding reversed a district court's finding that the president had exceeded his authority. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/10/05/miers_has_backed_wide_executive_role/?page=full In diesem Zusammenhang ist vielleicht interessant, was der Boston Globe ueber den neuen Verfassungsrichter Roberts und die Nominierung von Miers schreibt:

Miers has also been outspoken in her support of reauthorizing the Patriot Act, which gave the executive branch new powers of surveillance over US citizens. (…)
A New York University law professor, David Golove, said executive power is emerging as a defining issue for the Supreme Court in the post-Sept. 11, 2001, era. In case after case, the Bush administration has argued that it has the authority to take measures it deems necessary to stop terrorists, while others have insisted on maintaining checks and balances.

‘’Executive power issues are going to be coming before the court that are of tremendous significance,” Golove said, pointing to challenges to Patriot Act surveillance powers, the treatment of Guantanamo Bay prisoners, and the case of Jose Padilla, a US citizen being held without trial under the authority asserted by Bush to imprison anyone whom the government suspects of being a terrorist.

As the lineup of the Supreme Court evolves, so may its rulings on how much power the Constitution gives the president. That prospect has sent analysts hunting for clues in the records of Bush’s nominees.

This summer, for example, when Roberts was still an appeals court judge, he was part of a three-judge panel that ruled that Bush could bypass the Geneva Conventions, which require that prisoners of war be given court-martials, and could instead try a detainee before a military commission. Their holding reversed a district court’s finding that the president had exceeded his authority.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/10/05/miers_has_backed_wide_executive_role/?page=full

]]>